Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Jawad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Leave the socks, overall consensus is clear for delete Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 15:05, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmad Jawad

Socking users comments have been struckthrough per the WP:SPI here

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted by prod and immediately recreated, guys a businessman and I can't see anything in his career worthy of a Wikipedia BLP. Original creator was blocked as username company promotional. If deleted, please salt to stop any more wasted typing time. Promotional company is Harvest Tradings - Off2riorob (talk) 06:26, 13 September 2010 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 06:26, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt as non-notable bio per nom. Carrite (talk) 15:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep As point of view of the above user Off2riorob (talk) i don't think this notable personality goes for some marketing promotion. We know better for promotional stough, a lot of tools is to be there in the market. As per my reasearch this is first Pakistani Execuitve whose Vision to increase the growth of GDP with different approach. The unique carrier is to be there thathwhy he is on this position in very small period of time. The Carrite (talk) said that this non-notable bio person, i strongly disagree. Azamishaque (talk) 12:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]

It is alright to disagree and to think he is this and that, but we require reliable citations that support his notability. I have looked at the three citations in the article, at least one doesn't mention him at all and there is a minor mention in another. Off2riorob (talk) 19:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt No evidence of why he is notable, the users who just keep removing the AfD templates aren't doing themselves any favors. I've looked for sources in English, if there are other sources out there in other languages, perhaps those users could use their time more efficiently by finding them. --Terrillja _talk 21:37, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability is not shown. Edward321 (talk) 04:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*Do not Delete with the point of view of above respected users and as per my finding. this article is to be created in July 2010. if you saw the history many wikipedia users from around the globe have put edits including my self. in the light of above user called propmotional company Harvest Tradings, when this article is formed with the contribution of some other user. then after some days some Wiki admininstartor or some other user have deleted this article sudden. then it created again and the lobby have came for the deletion. i have one question for all of you i have more than 100 living person biographies on wikipedia of different countries, just visit and see whther they are 100%. the Notablity factor is to be there of the subject article. its better to improve and put better references rather to critcise. i have seen the mentioned references in 2 of them proper info is there.Nhapak (talk) 12:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC) [reply]

~~- — Nhapak (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.~~

Do not Delete and Salt its not about regarding favors. if we opened this debate then we should go for Netural point of view.Case_edu (talk) 12:42, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*KeepWith all due respect, i have found Brazil organization link, the subject person talking on governmental level to urge and give attentions towards expansion of exports in Russia market, and if some young chap is doing that much in this early age, it must be highlighted and gave a motivational look for young generation. Well at least i get motivated :)Azamishaque (talk) 15:35, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have struck this Keep comment. Please be aware users are only able to comment for deletion or keeping once. Off2riorob (talk) 10:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- we should think positive and you should also go for netural approach.some above users mentioned very valid points.Case_edu (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Think positive is not a valid argument, something based on WP:N and WP:V would be. If you can argue something applicable to that, your points will be more reasonable.--Terrillja _talk 14:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- - yes it purely lies on WP:N and WP:V but think is this not accepting by some users. still consunces is not there..Case_edu (talk) 08:36, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.